A California federal court has dismissed a proposed class action against Plum Organics alleging that large photos of fruits and vegetables on the company’s Mighty 4® Children’s Food product packaging mislead consumers into believing the products contain significant amounts of those fruits and vegetables. Workman v. Plum Inc., No. 15-2568 (N.D. Cal., filed November 2, 2015). The court refused to find that the mere inclusion of the pictures constituted misrepresentation. “The products at issue do not display any affirmative misrepresentations,” the court said. “They merely show pictures of featured ingredients contained in the puree pouch and fruit bars. No reasonable consumer would expect the size of the flavors pictured on the label to directly correlate with the predominance of the pictured ingredient in the puree blend.” In October 2015, Plum announced it would change its marketing, including product names, to better reflect the contents of its products. Additional information appears…
Tag Archives labeling
A California federal court has remanded a putative class action against Gerber Products Co. on the labeling of its Gerber® Graduates® Puffs to state court and declined to admit sales data into evidence on hearsay grounds. Gyorke-Takatri v. Nestle USA, Inc., No. 15-3702 (N.D. Cal., order entered November 6, 2015). The plaintiffs allege Gerber misleads consumers with its Graduates® Puffs marketing by implying the products are healthy with “vibrant images of fruits and vegetables on the outside of the Puffs’ packaging.” Gerber argued that the amount in controversy was more than $5 million and thus sufficient to justify federal court jurisdiction. The plaintiffs argued that the court should not consider the total retail sales of Puffs, which Gerber says is well over the $5 million threshold, because the data Gerber used to reach those numbers was gathered from Nielsen, a third party. The court agreed, finding that the third-party data…
Citing citizen petition and federal court requests for the agency to define “natural” for use in food labeling and determine if food products containing genetically engineered ingredients and high-fructose corn syrup may be labeled as “natural,” the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is soliciting information and comments about use of the term in the labeling of human food products. More specifically, FDA seeks responses to questions that include the following: (i) Should the agency define natural through rulemaking? (ii) Should the agency prohibit use of the term in food labeling? (iii) If the agency defines natural, what foods should be permitted to bear the term? (iv) Should certain production practices, e.g., salting, irradiating, be considered in defining the term? (v) Should natural be applied only to “unprocessed” foods? (vi) Should the way an ingredient is produced or sourced affect whether a product containing that ingredient be labeled natural? and…
The Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) alleging a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) based on USDA’s lack of response to ALDF’s 2011 rulemaking petition requesting mandatory labeling on foie gras produced through the forced feeding of ducks or geese. Animal Legal Def. Fund v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 15-5063 (N.D. Cal., San Francisco Div., filed November 5, 2015). ALDF argues that force-fed foie gras products are mislabeled because USDA certifies them as “[i]nspected for wholesomeness” despite the fact that force-feeding “induces a metabolic disease and commonly results in the onset of all of the conditions mentioned in [USDA’s Poultry Products Inspection Act].” The organization seeks a declaration that USDA has violated the APA and an injunction compelling the agency to substantively respond to the petition. “The USDA is responsible for ensuring that all poultry products that…
CJ America Inc., maker of Annie Chun’s soup and noodle products, and a plaintiff have reached a settlement in a lawsuit alleging the company misled consumers by selling products with monosodium glutamate (MSG) while labeling the foods with the claims “No MSG Added” or “100 percent all natural ingredients.” Petersen v. CJ America Inc., No. 14-2570 (S.D. Cal., settlement agreement filed October 30, 2015). Under the agreement, CJ America will pay $1.5 million to a settlement fund distributed in $1.50 increments to purchasers of each eligible product, with a limit of 10 claims for class members without proofs of purchase. Any remaining funds will be directed to the Mayo Clinic, Action for Healthy Kids and National Farm to School Network. CJ America will also remove “No MSG Added” from its product packaging for a minimum of three years. Attorneys for the plaintiff seek 25 percent of the settlement fund ($375,000)…
Conservationist group Oceana has issued a report purportedly finding that 43 percent of salmon samples purchased from U.S. restaurants and grocery stores were mislabeled. As a follow-up to a larger study, Oceana researchers DNA tested 82 salmon samples and compared them to the names under which restaurants and grocers sold them. Of the 32 salmon samples sold as "wild salmon," the tests indicated 69 percent were farmed; "Alaskan" or "Pacific" salmon was also likely to be mislabeled, with five of the nine samples discovered to be farmed Atlantic salmon. Large grocery stores were most likely to advertise their products correctly, while restaurants mislabeled 67 percent of fish offerings. The report further notes that salmon sold out-of-season was much more likely to be mislabeled. “The federal government should provide consumers with assurances that the seafood they purchase is safe, legally caught and honestly labeled,” Beth Lowell, senior campaign director at Oceana,…
A Massachusetts consumer has filed a putative class action against ACH Food Companies, Inc., manufacturer of Weber® BBQ Sauces, alleging the company misleadingly markets its products as "All Natural" despite containing caramel coloring. Demmler v. ACH Food Cos., Inc., No. 15-13556 (D. Mass., filed October 13, 2015). The complaint asserts that under Massachusetts and federal regulations, the term "natural" cannot be used on products containing artificial ingredients such as added flavoring or coloring, so ACH's use of caramel coloring precludes it from labeling and marketing its products as natural. The plaintiff alleges he paid a premium for the sauce because he believed it to be natural, and he seeks to represent a class of consumers alleging unjust enrichment and a violation of state law. Issue 582
A Florida federal court has given final approval to the settlement agreement in a lawsuit alleging Anheuser-Busch falsely advertised its Beck's® beer as imported even though it was manufactured in St. Louis, Mo. Marty v. Anheuser-Busch Cos., LLC, No. 13-23656 (S.D. Fla., approval entered October 20, 2015). Under the agreement, Anheuser-Busch will offer refunds in several tiers, including $0.10 per individual bottle, $0.50 per six-pack and $1.75 per 20-pack, with a cap of $50 per household for those consumers with receipts and $12 for those without. The company will also add language to Beck's® packaging indicating the beer is a "Product of USA." Additional details about the settlement appear in Issue 570 of this Update. Issue 582
A California federal court has dismissed without leave to amend several claims in a lawsuit alleging that Whole Foods Market fraudulently and misleadingly labeled its 365 Everyday Value ketchup, oatmeal and chicken broth as containing “evaporated cane juice” (ECJ) rather than “sugar.” Pratt v. Whole Food Mkt. Cal., Inc., No. 12-5652 (N.D. Cal., San Jose Div., order entered September 30, 2015). The plaintiff alleged that because Whole Foods failed to use the most common name for the ingredient—as mandated by U.S. Food and Drug Administration rules—the products were misbranded and “cannot be legally sold, possessed, have no economic value, and are legally worthless.” The court first dismissed strict liability allegations, finding that the plaintiff sought to impose a requirement inconsistent with federal law. Turning to the plausibility of the plaintiff’s allegations, the court found his reliance claims contradictory because one claim required him to know nothing about ECJ while the…
A Florida federal court has dismissed five putative class action claims, allowing one to continue, against Fifth Generation Inc. in a lawsuit alleging Tito’s® Handmade Vodka is not actually made by hand in “an old fashioned pot still” and thus is deceptively marketed. Pye v. Fifth Generation Inc., No. 14-0493 (N.D. Fla., order entered September 23, 2015). The court cited its May 2015 decision in Salters v. Beam addressing similar claims against Maker’s Mark®, finding that “[m]uch of the analysis here repeats what was said there.” Details about that decision appear in Issue 564 of this Update. The plaintiffs alleged that “handmade” means “made from scratch” or “in small units,” with human involvement in the process. The court disagreed, finding, “No reasonable person would understand ‘handmade’ in this context to mean literally made by hand. No reasonable person would understand ‘handmade’ in this context to mean substantial equipment was not…
