The Center for Food Safety, Center for Environmental Health and Beyond Pesticides have filed a lawsuit against the leaders of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Marketing Service and National Organic Program (NOP) arguing that USDA failed to allow public comments on a contaminated compost rule before issuing a guidance document on the subject. Ctr. for Envtl. Health v. Vilsack, No. 15-1690 (N.D. Cal., filed April 14, 2015). The 2011 guidance at issue allows organic producers to use compost materials treated with pesticides. According to the complaint, “NOP regulations expressly prohibit fertilizers and compost from containing any synthetic substances not included on the National List” of approved exceptions, but the Contaminated Compost decision “contravened that legal requirement, purporting to establish that organic producers may in fact use these contaminated plant and animal materials in compost under certain circumstances.” The decision was never subject to public comment, the plaintiffs argue,…
Tag Archives organic
Several policy groups, including Food & Water Watch and the Center for Food Safety, have filed a lawsuit challenging a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) procedural change in how ingredients are removed from the National List, a list of synthetics exempted from the Organic Foods Production Act (OFPA). Ctr. for Food Safety v. Vilsack, No. 15-1590 (N.D. Cal., filed April 7, 2015). The National List catalogs synthetic and prohibited natural substances that may be used in organic farming despite not being inherently organic because the substances (i) have been determined by USDA not to harm human health or the environment, (ii) cannot be replaced with an organic alternative and (iii) are consistent with organic farming and handling. The groups challenge a 2013 revision to the process for removing an exempted substance from the National List. OFPA created a sunset provision that removed substances from the list—thereby prohibiting their use in…
The estate and survivors of an 89-year-old woman who died after eating imported pomegranate seeds linked to a Hepatitis A outbreak have filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Townsend Farms Inc., Costco Wholesale Corp. and others alleging strict liability for a product defect, negligence and breach of implied warranties. Schelitzche v. Townsend Farms Inc., No. BC576437 (Cal. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty., filed March 23, 2015). The complaint details the 2013 outbreak of Hepatitis A virus, which the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and state and local health agencies apparently traced to 3-pound bags of Townsend Farms Organic Antioxidant Blend frozen berries sold at Costco. The plaintiffs seek wrongful-death and survival damages and other general, punitive and exemplary damages. While the plaintiffs’ suit is the first to claim wrongful-death damages, details of other lawsuits stemming from the same Hepatitis A outbreak appear in Issues…
Several organizations, including the Center for Biological Diversity, Environmental Working Group and Center for Food Safety as well as the city of Berkeley, California, have filed a lawsuit against the California Department of Food and Agriculture to contest the agency’s approval of a pest management plan that allows pesticide spraying on organic farms, schools and residential yards. Envtl. Working Grp. v. Cal. Dep’t of Food and Agric., No. RG15755648 (Super. Ct. Cal., Alameda Cty., filed January 22, 2015). The groups challenge the alleged lack of evidence supporting the conclusion that the program will have no effect on Californians’ health and argue that the plan violates state environmental laws, including the requirement of public notice before spraying pesticides and the requirement to analyze the impacts on human and environmental health. A January 22, 2015, Center for Biological Diversity press release asserts that the agency received 30,000 opposition letters to the program.…
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agriculture Marketing Service has extended until February 17, 2015, the comment period for a proposed rule that would expand assessment exemptions for commodity promotion activities “to cover all ‘organic’ and ‘100 percent organic’ products certified under the National Organic Program regardless of whether the person requesting the exemption also produces, handles, or imports conventional or nonorganic products.” Under the current rule, the exemption applies only to those who exclusively produce and market products certified as 100 percent organic. Additional details about the original notice appear in Issue 549 of this Update. See Federal Register, January 15, 2015. Issue 551
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Organic Program (NOP) has published draft guidance clarifying the agency’s interpretation of regulations that require organic operations to “maintain or improve the natural resources of the operation, including soil and water quality.” Intended for accredited certifying agents and certified operations, the guidance provides examples of production practices that support the principles of natural resource and biodiversity conservation. It also describes (i) “the certified organic operator’s responsibility to select, carry out, and record production practices that ‘maintain or improve the natural resources of the operation’”; (ii) “the accredited certifying agent’s responsibility to verify operator compliance with this requirement”; and (ii) “how domestic organic operations that participate in a USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) program and the NOP can reduce their paperwork burdens.” The agency will accept comments on the draft guidance until February 27, 2015. See Federal Register, December 29, 2014. Issue 550
The U.S. Department of Agriculture has proposed a rule that would allow anyone producing, handling, marketing, or importing certified organic products to be exempt from paying the assessments associated with commodity promotion activities like advertising. The exemption would cover all “organic” and “100 percent organic” products certified under the National Organic Program. The current rule allows the exemption to apply only to those who exclusively produce and market products certified as 100 percent organic, but the proposed rule would broaden application to include all organic products regardless of whether the person or company imports or handles nonorganic products as well. Comments on the proposed rule must be received by January 15, 2015. See Federal Register, December 16, 2014. Issue 549
Oregon farmers who grow genetically engineered (GE) alfalfa have filed a complaint seeking a declaration that a May 20, 2014, Jackson County ordinance banning GE crops in the county conflicts with state law, or, in the alternative, damages “as just compensation for the forced destruction of their property.” Schulz Family Farms LLC v. Jackson Cty., No. 14CV17636 (Jackson Cty. Cir. Ct., Ore., filed November 18, 2014). Claiming that (i) neighbors had never complained about its GE crops, which are allegedly “more convenient and profitable to grow than conventional alfalfa,” and (ii) the farm will have to tear out GE crops already planted and refrain from replanting conventional alfalfa for four years, the Schulz Family Farms alleges damages in excess of $2.2 million. Similarly, plaintiff James Frink alleges that he will have to tear out already-planted GE alfalfa and “lose the benefit of the ten-year crop life if forced to tear out…
The Organic Trade Association (OTA) has reportedly submitted two petitions to the National Organic Program (NOP) requesting changes to the National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances for organic processing and handling. Citing recent innovations, OTA has asked NOP to strengthen the rules governing natural flavors in certified products to require the use of organic flavors when commercially available. The group has also moved to strike lignin sulfonate from the list “as an allowed flotation agent in postharvest handling of organic produce.” In particular, OTA argues that “the number of organic flavors in the marketplace is now substantial,” negating the need for many natural flavors that must still be made without the use of synthetic solvents, synthetic carriers, artificial preservatives, genetic engineering, or irradiation. The association also notes that innovations in organic pear handling have rendered lignin sulfonate obsolete, especially since the National List already includes an alternative floating agent…
The Center for Food Safety (CFS) has issued a report challenging the proposed organic aquaculture production regulations under consideration by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Titled Like Water and Oil: Ocean-Based Fish Farming and Organic Don’t Mix, the report argues that USDA should reject proposed standards that would allegedly dilute the value of organic certification by allowing the agency’s seal to appear on fish products sourced from ocean-based farms. In addition to citing the high number of fish escapes reported in the previous two decades, CFS claims that “open-ocean fish farms can never be organic,” partly because synthetic chemicals prohibited under the Organic Foods Production Act (OFPA) are ubiquitous in the marine environment. The group also alleges that open-ocean farming not only alters the natural behavior of migratory fish in violation of OFPA, but harms wild fisheries by using wild-caught fish as a feed source. “It’s mind-boggling to think that…
