The Consumer Reports (CR) Food Safety and Sustainability Center has reportedly tested more than 80 processed foods for genetically engineered (GE) corn or soy, concluding that products labeled “natural” contained GE ingredients in levels comparable to those of their conventional counterparts. After analyzing breakfast cereals, bars, corn chips and tortillas, baking mixes and flour, meat and dairy substitutes, and tofu/tempeh, CR reported that (i) the majority of corn and soy identified in conventional products was genetically modified; (ii) products deemed “no GMO” by the manufacturer were less than 0.9 percent GE corn or soy; and (iii) products bearing third-party “Organic” or “Non GMO Product Verified” claims also contained negligible amounts of GE corn or soy. Based on these findings, CR has dubbed “Natural” labels “not meaningful,” as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not enforce any formal definition for this label. In addition, CR Food Safety and Sustainability Center…
Tag Archives organic
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Organic Program (NOP) has issued a final rule amending the National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances (National List), which governs the use of synthetic and nonsynthetic substances in organic crop production and processing. Effective October 30, 2014, the final rule adds biodegradable biobased mulch film to the National List and defines third-party standards for compostability, biodegradability and biobased content. The agency also removed nonorganic hops (Humulus lupulus) and unmodified rich starch from the National List, as their use exemptions have expired, and rejected recommendations to include Citrus hystrix and curry leaves on the National List. See Federal Register, September 30, 2014. Issue 539
A California federal court has approved a settlement in a case accusing Guayaki Sustainable Rainforest Products Inc. of misleading its customers by listing “organic evaporated cane juice” (ECJ) as an ingredient of its yerba mate products. Cowan v. Guayaki Sustainable Rainforest Prods. Inc., No. 14-1248 (U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Cal., order entered September 16, 2014). The terms of the settlement agreement are confidential. The plaintiff’s suit was part of a deluge of putative class actions alleging product mislabeling because the companies included ECJ on their ingredient lists rather than, plaintiffs have argued, the more common and accepted term for the substance, sugar. Many of these cases have been dismissed without prejudice or stayed while courts and parties await promised guidance on the issue from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Additional information on recent cases appears in Issues 534, 532 and 530 of this Update. Issue 538
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Organic Program has announced a public meeting of the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) on October 28-30, 2014, in Louisville, Kentucky. The meeting will include recommendations from the board’s six subcommittees on a wide range of topics, including “substances petitioned to the National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances (National List), substances on the National List that require NOSB review before their 2015 and 2016 sunset dates, updates from working groups on technical issues, and amendments to guidance on organic policies.” In particular, the Handling Subcommittee intends “to take up the issue of whether to prohibit BPA [bisphenol A] in packaging material used for organic foods in light of mounting evidence that it may be harmful.” To this end, NOSB plans to prioritize research dedicated to finding “suitable alternatives for the linings of cans used for various organic products such as tomatoes, beans and…
A plaintiff has accused cereal company Organic Milling of mislabeling its Nutritious Living Hi-Lo brand cereals as “100% natural” despite allegedly containing synthetic and heavily processed ingredients and being produced with genetically modified (GM) crops. Mirto v. Organic Milling, No. BC553780 (Super. Ct. Cal., Los Angeles Cty., filed Aug. 5, 2014). The complaint alleges first that the use of GM crops in the cereal’s production precludes the company from using the phrase “100% natural” on its marketing materials, citing definitions from the World Health Organization and Environmental Protection Agency to argue that “GM crops are not ‘natural,’ and products made from these crops, including [Organic Milling’s products], are not ‘100% natural.’” The complaint further argues that Organic Milling’s use of canola oil in Hi-Lo cereal is not “100% natural” either because of the heavy processing required to produce the oil. The plaintiff also objects to the use of emulsifier soy…
According to a putative class action removed to Arkansas federal court, Whole Foods mislabels several of its 365 Everyday Value brand products as “organic” or “all natural” despite containing synthetic ingredients. Stafford v. Whole Foods Market Cal., No. 14-420 (E.D. Ark., removed July 22, 2014). Originally filed in Arkansas state court in June, the complaint accuses several products of mislabeling—for example, the plaintiff says, the 365 Everyday Value soft drink contains carbon dioxide, citric acid, tartaric acid, and caramel coloring despite its “all natural” label. Whole Foods argued to the state court that the potential class contains more than 100 people who seek over $5 million in damages, so the case was removed to federal court. Alleging that Whole Foods violated Arkansas labeling laws and breached warranties, the plaintiff seeks class certification, damages and interest. A similar case filed in New Jersey state court alleges that Breyers, a subsidiary of Unilever…
The Beech-Nut Nutrition Co. has filed a complaint against an organic baby-food maker seeking a declaration that Beech-Nut has not infringed any of Plum PBC’s trademarks and that the trademarks Plum has asserted to the word “JUST” and certain phrases are invalid. Beech-Nut Nutrition Co. v. Plum PBC, No. 14-0791 (N.D.N.Y., filed June 30, 2014). According to the complaint, Plum sent Beech-Nut a cease-and-desist letter in June 2014 shortly after Beech-Nut launched a new line of whole fruit and vegetable foods for babies including the word “just” on product labels and advertised them under a promotional campaign “This is not baby food” and “This is real food for babies.” The letter allegedly demanded that Beech-Nut stop infringing Plum’s “JUST” trademark and using the promotional phrases. Beech-Nut contends that (i) the word “just” is simply descriptive and generic; (ii) Plum does not use the trademark symbol beside the word on its product…
A California federal court has dismissed with prejudice a putative class action alleging that Hain Celestial Group Inc. mislabels its vegetable juice products as “organic” and “raw” one day before a proposed class action was filed against the company in New York federal court alleging similar claims about its baby foods and home care products. Alamilla, et al. v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc., No. 13–5595 (N.D. Cal., order entered July 2, 2014); Segedie v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., No. 14–5029 (S.D.N.Y., filed July 3, 2014). The California court dismissed the case based on two articles cited and incorporated into the complaint concluding that “pressurization has ‘little or no effects’ on nutritional and sensory quality aspects of foods,” which contradicted the plaintiffs’ argument that the treatment deprives the juice of nutritional value and that the company’s representations that it does not cook the juice are thus misleading. As a result of…
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) National Organic Program (NOP) has issued final guidance on the use of “Made with Organic” claims on product labeling. According to NOP, the guidance seeks to clarify “the following aspects of products in this labeling category”: (i) “composition”; (ii) “compliant organic labeling claims”; (iii) “organic and nonorganic forms of the same ingredient”; (iv) “percentage of organic ingredients statements”; and (v) “ingredients or food groups in the ‘made with organic’ claim.” Available through “The Program Handbook: Guidance and Instructions for Accredited Certifying Agents and Certified Operations,” the new policies reflect NOP’s current thinking on organic product labeling. In particular, “Made with Organic” products “must contain at least 70 percent organic ingredients, excluding salt and water”; “may contain up to 30 percent nonorganic ingredients,” provided any nonagricultural ingredient is allowed by the National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances; and “must not contain any ingredient that was produced…
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) has announced an April 29-May 2, 2014, public meeting in San Antonio, Texas, to discuss the work of its six subcommittees and receive input on proposed changes to the National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances (National List), which governs what may be used in organic handling and production. Among other things, the meeting will address several petitions proposing the addition, extension or deletion of substances scheduled for reassessment under the National List’s sunset review rules. In particular, petitioners have requested (i) a National List extension for streptomycin—slated to expire October 14, 2014—to allow “adequate time for the transition from strep over to non-antibiotic, biological alternatives for fire blight control”; (ii) revisions to provisions governing the use of synthetic methionine in poultry feed; (iii) the addition of several synthetic substances used in aquaculture production; and (iv) the removal of synthetic…
