A California resident has filed a putative nationwide class action against Suja Life, LLC, alleging that the company, which advertises and labels its juice products as “raw” and “cold-pressed,” misleads consumers because it uses a high pressure processing (HPP) treatment that alters the nutrients and live enzymes that raw-product purchasers wish to consume. Heikkila v. Suja Life, LLC, No. 14-0556 (N.D. Cal., filed February 5, 2014). Claiming that HPP’s effects on juice products are “identical to those of traditional pasteurization—inactivated enzymes, inactivated probiotics, altered physical properties of the product, and denatured proteins, among other undesirable qualities,” the plaintiff alleges that the products “are nothing more than run-of-the-mill, processed juices.”

According to the complaint, the plaintiff reviewed the company’s Website,
packaging and labeling before making her purchase and paid a premium
price for the products. She contends that raw juices have a short shelf life
and are thus more expensive than “the average 100% pasteurized juices. . . .
Surprisingly, Defendant’s Juice Products, unlike other raw and unpasteurized
juices on the market have a considerably longer shelf life of about 30 days.”

Alleging violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, breach of express
warranty and the implied warranty of merchantability, unjust enrichment/
common law restitution, and violations of California’s Consumers Legal
Remedies Act, Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law, the plaintiff
seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, compensatory and punitive damages,
disgorgement, restitution, interest, attorney’s fees, and costs.

According to a news source, the law firm that filed the suit also filed the same
types of claims on behalf of four named plaintiffs in 2013 against Hain Celestial
for its BluePrint HPP-treated juices, which are also marketed as “raw.” That
suit has apparently been dismissed without prejudice at the plaintiffs’ request.
While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has defined “fresh,” a term that
cannot be used for HPP products, no specific regulations have been developed
for those products labeled “raw.” See BevNet.com, February 12, 2014.

 

Issue 513

About The Author

For decades, manufacturers, distributors and retailers at every link in the food chain have come to Shook, Hardy & Bacon to partner with a legal team that understands the issues they face in today's evolving food production industry. Shook attorneys work with some of the world's largest food, beverage and agribusiness companies to establish preventative measures, conduct internal audits, develop public relations strategies, and advance tort reform initiatives.

Close