Candy maker Fannie May faces a proposed class action alleging the confectioner underfilled some of its 7-ounce chocolate boxes by as much as 50 percent. Benson v. Fannie May, No. 17-3519 (N.D. Ill., filed May 10, 2017). The allegations involve boxes of Hot Fudge Truffles, Mint Meltaways , Peanut Butter Buckeyes, milk and dark Sea Salt Caramels, regular and bite-sized Pixies , milk and dark Carmarsh and Trinidads sold at the company’s retail stores and on its website as well as other retail and online outlets nationwide. The plaintiffs allege that nonfunctional slack-fill in the company’s nontransparent boxes violates the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act as well as Illinois consumer protection statutes and seek class certification, equitable relief, monetary damages and attorney's fees. Issue 634
Consumer advocacy group Beyond Pesticides has filed suit against the maker of Mott’s applesauce products, alleging the term “natural” on its labels misleads consumers because the products contain the pesticide acetamiprid. Beyond Pesticides v. Dr Pepper Snapple Grp., No. 2017 CA 003156 B (D.C. Super. Ct., filed May 5, 2017). The plaintiff asserts that the “natural” and “All Natural Ingredients” labeling on several varieties of Mott’s applesauce mislead consumers who would not expect the products to contain a “synthetic, unnatural chemical.” Claiming violations of the District of Columbia’s Consumer Protection Procedures Act, the plaintiff seeks injunctive and equitable relief—including the establishment of a “community fund” to raise consumer awareness of acetamiprid—and attorney’s fees. Issue 634
New York City is reportedly considering a bill that would require curbside recycling of expanded polystyrene foam (EPS) containers. The city’s Sanitation Department is currently under a court mandate to develop a plan to collect and clean EPS containers. New York City previously attempted to ban EPS containers in 2013, but a court invalidated the prohibition after a challenge by several food companies, supermarkets and foodservice businesses. Additional details on the decision and the city’s appeal appear in Issues 579 and 583 of this Update. See Huffington Post, May 4, 2017; New York Post, May 7, 2017. Issue 634
A California federal court has ruled that plaintiffs who admitted to reading Healthy Beverage’s website cannot sue the company for listing evaporated cane juice (ECJ) on the ingredient list rather than sugar. Swearingen v. Healthy Beverage, No. 13-4385 (N.D. Cal., order entered May 5, 2017). The plaintiffs initially filed a putative class action claiming Healthy Beverage misled consumers by listing evaporated cane juice on their product labels, but they later alleged in an amended complaint that the company’s website “is incorporated into the label for each of Defendants’ products” and that the website states “cane juice is natural sugar.” Given those allegations, the court dismissed the suit with prejudice, holding, “An allegation of reliance, which is necessary for all of plaintiffs’ claims” under California consumer protection laws and unjust enrichment, was “impossible . . . [t]he Court will not allow them a third bite at the apple to amend a…
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has delayed the effective date of a final rule amending organic livestock and poultry requirements and requests additional public comment. The effective date of the rule has been postponed from May 19, 2017, to November 14, 2017. Interested parties may submit written comments by June 9, 2017. Issue 634
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has issued a statement rejecting an Italian study claiming a link between the use of the sweetener sucralose and cancer in mice. The EFSA Journal’s review of a 10-year study conducted by the Ramazzini Institute criticized the study’s design and methodology, concluding that available data does not support the institute’s claim that sucralose may cause lymphoma or leukemia in mice. Among other criticisms, the panel said the design introduced too many variable factors that could make the data difficult to interpret, and there was no demonstrated dose-response relationship between exposure to sucralose and incidence of cancer. EFSA also pointed to the study’s failure to establish a cause-effect relationship in epidemiological studies and said there was no reliable evidence of in vivo or in vitro genotoxicity. Issue 634
The U.S. Senate has confirmed Scott Gottlieb to lead the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in a 57-42 vote. Gottlieb previously served as a deputy FDA commissioner and an official at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services during the George W. Bush administration. Among Gottlieb's critics are senators who expressed concern over his connections with the pharmaceutical and medical device industry, but Gottlieb has promised to divest himself from several companies and recuse himself from decisions involving those companies for one year. See New York Times and Washington Post, May 9, 2017. Issue 634
A federal court has ruled that Sazerac Co. may take Fetzer Vineyards, Inc. to trial for its trade-dress claims but cannot seek damages because it failed to disclose damage calculations in a timely manner. Sazerac Co. v. Fetzer Vineyards, Inc., No. 15-4618 (N.D. Cal, order entered April 27, 2017). Sazerac, maker of Buffalo Trace bourbon, alleged Fetzer’s use of a buffalo and the words “bourbon barrel aged” on the label of its 1000 Stories zinfandel infringed its federal trademark and trade-dress rights. Sazerac “demonstrated a triable issue whether consumers are likely to be confused by Fetzer’s buffalo and trade dress,” the court found. However, Sazerac indicated it would provide damage calculations based on expert testimony, but it failed to propose a valid methodology until shortly before the settlement conference, when it instead presented calculations based on third-party licensing agreements. Because of the irremediable prejudice to Fetzer, the court ruled that…
A Maryland consumer alleges that when she used coupons offering a free sandwich with the purchase of an initial sandwich, Burger King locations in Maryland, Virginia, the District of Columbia and Florida charged her more than they would have if she had purchased sandwiches without the coupons. Anderson v. Burger King, No. 17-1204 (D. Md., filed May 2, 2017). The complaint asserts that Burger King’s coupon promotion offers a “free” sausage, egg and cheese breakfast “Croissan’wich” to customers who buy one Croissan’wich at the regular price. The plaintiff claims she went to a Maryland location, presented a coupon and was charged $3.19 for the two sandwiches she received. She later purchased a single sandwich and was charged only $2.16, the complaint alleges. She found similar results at locations in (i) the District of Columbia, where the two coupon sandwiches cost $4.61 and the single sandwich cost $1; (ii) Virginia, where…
Two putative class actions allege that Trader Joe’s “Black Truffle Flavored” olive oil and Monini’s “White Truffle Flavored” olive oil are flavored with synthetic chemicals rather than truffles. Brumfield v. Trader Joe’s, No. 17-3239 (S.D.N.Y, filed May 2, 2017); Jessani v. Monini N. Am., No. 17-3257 (S.D.N.Y., filed May 2, 2017). The plaintiffs argue that the products are sold for significantly more—34 percent more for Trader Joe’s and 459 percent more for Monini—than olive oil without additional flavoring. Claiming violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and state consumer protection statutes, the plaintiffs seek class certification, an injunction, damages, restitution and attorney’s fees. Issue 633
