A consumer has filed a putative class action alleging Mondelez Global LLC misleads consumers by making its Honey Maid graham crackers primarily with white flour rather than graham flour. Kennedy v. Mondelez Global LLC, No. 19-0302 (E.D.N.Y., filed January 15, 2019). The complaint alleges that Honey Maid products are marketed as "graham crackers" while the ingredients panel lists "unbleached enriched flour" first and "graham flour" second. The plaintiff cites Dictionary.com to assert that consumers expect a "graham cracker" to be "a slightly sweet cracker made of whole wheat flour" and that any cracker made with more white than graham flour cannot be called a graham cracker. The plaintiff seeks class certification, injunctive relief, damages and attorney's fees for an alleged violation of New York consumer-protection law, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, unjust enrichment and breach of warranties.
In a series of tweets, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Scott Gottlieb announced that about 200 food investigators—of 550—for the agency's Office of Human and Animal Food Operations have been working during the federal government's partial shutdown, with additional staff possibly "on the way depending on needs." Gottlieb further noted which food operations have continued during the shutdown: (i) "[h]igh-risk domestic food surveillance inspections"; (ii) "foodborne illness surveillance and outbreak investigations"; (iii) "[e]xecution of high-risk food recalls"; (iv) "[i]nspection of foreign food facilities"; and (v) "[s]ampling of imported food samples (including sampling for antibiotic residue contamination and decomposition analysis." High-risk foods reportedly include seafood, dairy, fresh produce, spices, eggs, sandwiches and infant formula.
A Nebraska state senator has withdrawn a proposed bill to define "meat" as an animal-derived product. Sen. Carol Blood submitted the bill to protect the state's meat industry, according to the Washington Post. "All I'm asking for is truth in advertising. It's clear that meat comes from livestock, and livestock is our livelihood in Nebraska," Blood reportedly said. A motion to withdraw the bill was filed January 23, 2019, and Blood did not comment on the withdrawal.
The Center for Food Safety (CFS) has filed a petition recommending that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibit the use of hydroponic agriculture in the cultivation of organic food. "Hydroponic production systems are fundamentally different from organic production systems as defined by federal law—they do not promote soil health or conserve biodiversity," the petition states. "Organic certification of hydroponics thus misleads consumers, because these products are indistinguishable from truly organically produced products with the same label." CFS argues that organic production by definition must include soil, citing the Organic Foods Production Act and noting that the statute and the National Organic Program's final rule implementing it do not include the words "hydroponic" or "soilless." The petition urges USDA to amend existing regulations to expressly prohibit hydroponic systems in organic production and revoke existing organic certifications issued to hydroponic operations.
Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) have sent a letter to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requesting an update to federal regulations on cannabidiol (CBD) to "give U.S. producers more flexibility in the production, consumption, and sale of hemp products." Wyden and Merkley urge FDA to answer a series of clarifying questions, including "What lawful pathways are currently available for those who seek approval to introduce Cannabis sativa L. and its derivatives as a food, beverages or dietary supplement, including into interstate commerce?" and "Are there circumstances in which Cannabis sativa L. and its derivatives may be permitted as a food, beverages or dietary supplement by the agency?" “Farmers in Oregon and nationwide are poised to make real economic gains for their communities once these regulations are updated,” a press release quotes Wyden and Merkley as saying. “We will be closely engaged in the ongoing implementation…
Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) has published a report on food safety in the United States. The report finds an increase in food recalls since 2013 but acknowledges that systemic advances in food-safety issue detection may partly account for that increase. The authors make a number of policy recommendations, including (i) requiring food-production plants to address the most common pathogens in their safety plans; (ii) establishing "clear enforcement consequences for recurring violations of food safety protections or plans"; (iii) declaring antibiotic-resistant strains of Salmonella as "an adulterant in meat and poultry"; (iv) improving food traceability; (v) granting the U.S. Department of Agriculture "mandatory recall authority for contaminated food"; and (vi) penalizing companies that "continue to sell products after a recall."
The U.K. Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has ruled that Red Bull Co. made unauthorized health claims about purported benefits of its energy drink on mental focus and concentration. The company's subway advertisement featured cartoon women in an office setting with the text "The Secret to Finishing Early." The ad referenced a consumer initiative encouraging workers to leave the office early one September 2018 day. "The ASA considered that while the ad’s tone was light-hearted, the scenario it presented of being overwhelmed or busy at work was one that would be familiar and relatable to consumers," the agency's assessment summary states. "While we understood that the ad was intended to be part of a marketing initiative aimed at encouraging consumers to improve their productivity and leave at 4 pm on a specific day, we considered that the penultimate line of the poem, '… to leap every hurdle a hectic day brings'…
Washington, D.C., brewery Atlas Brew Works has filed a First Amendment lawsuit and motion for preliminary injunction alleging that the federal government's partial shutdown has violated its right to speak because the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau has stopped issuing label approvals, causing beer production to halt. Atlas Brew Works v. Whitaker, No. 19-0079 (D.D.C., filed January 15, 2019). The complaint asserts that Atlas "sits on 40 barrels of seasonal, perishable beer—an apricot-infused India pale ale known as The Precious One—that it cannot lawfully label for interstate sale in kegs, as scheduled, for lack of a [Certificate of Label Approval (COLA)]." The brewery alleges that its speech—through labels—is essential to its business because it "cannot sell, and no one will purchase, random unidentified liquids." Atlas argues that its First Amendment rights have been violated because "it cannot be denied the right to speak for lack of meeting an…
The owner of a trademark on "Metchup" has filed an infringement suit alleging that H.J. Heinz Co.'s "Mayochup" is "confusingly similar" to his protected trademark. Perry v. H.J. Heinz Co. Brands, No. 19-0280 (E.D. La., filed January 14, 2019). The plaintiff has purportedly used the "Metchup" mark to sell his ketchup-mayonnaise and mustard-mayonnaise combinations since 2010, and he asserts that Kraft Heinz Co. has infringed on his trademark by using a mark that "bears a particularly strong phonetic similarity to Plaintiff's mark. Depending on pronunciation and/or regional dialect, the marks are virtually indistinguishable from one another." The complaint further cites Google search results for "metchup," which direct searchers to the Heinz website, as evidence that consumers are confusing the two marks. The plaintiff seeks an injunction, destruction of infringing materials, damages and attorney's fees for allegations of counterfeiting, trademark infringement, false designation of origin and violations of Louisiana's business codes.
A plaintiff has alleged that Food for Life Baking Co. Inc. misled consumers by advertising its cereal product, Ezekiel 4:9, as nutritionally superior to comparable cereal products because it is made with sprouted grains. Elliott v. Food for Life Baking Co. Inc., No. 19-0249 (E.D.N.Y., filed January 13, 2019). The complaint asserts that Ezekiel 4:9's labeling makes nutrient claims comparing its sprouted grains to non-sprouted grains without including "any reference food upon which the relative claims are based, which is misleading because there is no way to accurately evaluate the statements regarding the higher nutritional values of sprouted grains compared to non-sprouted grains." In addition, the complaint contests Ezekiel 4:9's assertion that the grains are a "living food" because "by the time the sprouted grain is dried, grounded into flour and heated, any nutritional benefits which may have existed have been extinguished." For allegations of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment,…
