According to a news source, a California appeals court indicated during oral argument that it would likely reverse the dismissal order of a lower court in a wrongful death action alleging that Dole Food Co. paid Colombian paramilitaries to kill 170 people near South American banana plantations. Gomez v. Dole Food Co., Inc., No. B242400 (Cal. Ct. App., 2d App. Div.). During the June 12, 2013, hearing, the court reportedly said “legal problems” with the trial court’s dismissal were sufficient to warrant reversal. In 2012, the lower court dismissed the suit after the plaintiffs’ lawyers failed to file a new complaint within 30 days after an appeals court ruling allowing them to do so became final. Plaintiffs’ counsel apparently claimed that they were unaware of the deadline imposed under California procedural rules and that the court erred by dismissing the case on the basis of Dole’s purported ex parte application.…
Tag Archives California
A pastry chef and food blogger has filed a copyright-infringement lawsuit against the owner of Food Network, alleging the channel copied her video tutorial for “Snow Globe Cupcakes.” LaBau v. Television Food Network G.P., No. 14-4077 (C.D. Cal., filed June 1, 2017). Elizabeth LaBau, owner of a website that provides recipes and tutorials for desserts, asserts that she created a tutorial for making edible snow globes using gelatin sheets and balloons in 2015, and the post caught enough attention for the cupcakes to become her "signature recipe." In November 2016, she created a tutorial video explaining how to create the Snow Globe Cupcakes, then learned in December 2016 that Food Network had published a similar video illustrating how to prepare the cupcakes. "The Food Network video copied numerous copyrightable elements of Plaintiff's work precisely, including but not limited to choices of shots, camera angles, colors, and lighting, textual descriptors, and…
A California federal court has granted a motion to dismiss a consolidated proposed class action alleging Trader Joe’s underfilled its five-ounce cans of tuna, holding the plaintiffs’ claims are preempted by the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). In re Trader Joe’s Tuna Litig., No. 16-1371 (C.D. Cal., order entered June 2, 2017). The plaintiffs commissioned the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to test several varieties of Trader Joe’s canned tuna, and the agency apparently determined that some cans were filled as much as 25 percent below the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) minimum. Additional information on one of the consolidated complaints appears in Issue 589 of this Update. Trader Joe’s argued that the weights listed on the labels were accurate and that the plaintiffs’ claim was preempted by federal law because it was based on an alleged violation of FDA standards. The court agreed, finding the FDCA…
A federal court has denied class certification to plaintiffs in multidistrict litigation involving false advertising claims for 5-Hour Energy® drinks, finding they failed to allege that common issues predominate over individual ones, including a common definition of “energy.” In re 5-Hour Energy Mktg. and Sales Practices Litig., No. 13-2438 (C.D. Cal., order entered June 7, 2017). The plaintiffs could not establish the definition of “energy,” the court found, because they defined it as “caloric energy” based on U.S. Food and Drug Administration dietary-supplement standards but did not show that consumers interpret “energy” the same way. In addition, plaintiffs in California, Missouri and New Mexico proposed a theory of liability based on underfilling, alleging that the product provided only 3.7 minutes of caloric energy instead of five hours, while plaintiffs in other states did not argue for the theory. Issue 637
California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has announced that a public hearing on “naturally occurring” lead levels in chili or tamarind candy has been rescheduled for July 6, 2017. Comments on the petition may be submitted by email or in writing by July 20, 2017. Issue 637
The family of Bob Marley will receive more than $2.8 million in damages and unpaid royalties from Jammin Java Corp. in a trademark-infringement suit. FiftySix Hope Rd. Music Ltd. v. Jammin Java, No. 16-5810 (C.D. Cal., order entered May 30, 2017). The family’s companies, 56 Hope Road Music Ltd. and Hope Road Merchandising LLC, own the late musician’s intellectual property and publicity rights and sued Jammin Java after it failed to pay royalties on a license to produce Marley Coffee. Jammin Java was founded by Marley’s son Rohan, who left the company in 2008. Issue 636
A consumer has filed a proposed class action alleging Sargento Foods misleadingly advertises its cheese products as “natural” despite containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) or animal growth hormones. Stanton v. Sargento Foods, Inc., No. 17-2881 (N.D. Cal., filed May 19, 2017). The plaintiff asserts that the cows providing milk for the production of Sargento cheeses are fed GMO corn and soybeans as well as a growth hormone. Alleging violations of state consumer protection acts and breach of warranty laws, the plaintiff seeks class certification, damages, an injunction and attorney’s fees. Issue 636
A California jury found that retired University of California, Davis, professors willfully infringed the university’s patents on strawberries they developed in the school’s program. Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Cal. Berry Cultivars, No. 16-2477 (N.D. Cal., verdict filed May 24, 2017). The professors formed a private strawberry-breeding company, California Berry Cultivars, after retiring from UC Davis. The jury found they had engaged in conversion, willful infringement, breach of duty of loyalty and breach of fiduciary duty, but released them from allegations that they interfered with the university’s business contracts or prospective economic relationships. Additional details appear in Issues 604 and 633 of this Update. Issue 636
A group of California citrus growers has sued the U.S. Department of Agriculture seeking to stop implementation of a new rule that would lift the ban on importation of lemons from Argentina, claiming the rule violates both “sound science and good public policy.” U.S. Citrus Sci. Council v. USDA, No. 17-0680 (E.D. Cal., filed May 17, 2017). The plaintiffs assert that the United States has banned Argentine lemon imports since 1947 because “highly destructive plant pests and diseases plague Argentine citrus” and the Argentine government agency charged with plant protection “has a long and problematic history of failing to report pest and disease outbreaks promptly and of failing to ensure compliance” with basic plant protection measures. The plaintiffs argue that the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service violated both the Plant Protection Act and the Administrative Procedure Act when it promulgated the new rule relying on conclusions reached during a…
Two proposed class actions have been filed in California claiming false labeling of truffle-flavored olive oil. Schiffman v. Urbani Truffles, No. 17-935 (E.D. Cal., filed May 3, 2017); Quiroz v. Sabatino Truffles, No. 17-783 (C.D. Cal., filed May 3, 2017). The plaintiffs argue that the olive oil producers add 2,4 dithiapentane to flavor their products instead of truffles and sell the “truffle infusions” at markups as high as 1,400 percent over the price of plain olive oils. The actions claim violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and state consumer protection laws. Details on similar lawsuits in New York appear in Issue 633 of this Update. Issue 634
